I attempt to overcome the chasm, the divide, between many philosophical traditions. Maintaining traditions that don't talk to any other traditions makes thinking stale.
Somebody voted Kristeva? Seriously? I mean, she's great and all, but if you consider factors like influence on others, staying power, etc, she's a bit of a blip...
Just a thought: Badiou and Zizek are still writing and their influence won't be properly felt until the mid 21st Century. so I think both those thinkers are not in the 'Best Philosopher of the 20th' category..
I feel your concerns. However, there is significant work drawing from these people that merit, in my opinion, an estimation of their work. I think that Butler's influence is clearly felt for feminism in the tradition of cultural critique., and she is still living. Kristeva also comes to mind. Given that there are more philosophers than ever before in recorded history, we can have a better idea of living philosophers that have a current influence than in previous decades.
Cut the root and the whole tree dies, trim a branch and it will grow another--Using this simple criteria it would seem to me that, though there are other lineages represented (Bergson for example) Husserl is the main root of most of those on your list. That said i think a very strong argument could be made for someone missing from your list and often overlooked for his historical importance and far-reaching influence in not only philosophy but psychology, art and literature as well: Alexandre Kojève. His lectures were attended by Raymond Queneau, Georges Bataille, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, André Breton, Jacques Lacan and Raymond Aron. He also influenced Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida.
The problem with such a survey is the inevitable limitation of the website not allowing more than 30 entries, and the eclectic manner in which such a survey was constructed. There's also no Meinong, Natorp etc.
Since framing a poll around a forgone conclusion(Heidegger) maybe a more interesting question would have been: "Who is the most underrated" , "When will they shut up about...", or a "My guilty pleasure is..."
I think Levinas and Gadamer are interesting thinkers actually. I'm bewildered by Levinas' insistence that philosophy abandon ontology, especially ethics.
Deleuze is in second place, which I like. Again, Heidegger has had an immense influence on the 20th Century, and Deleuze is starting to rival it.
Of course I agree that both Badiou and Zizek are currently influencing thinking all over the world, but the full extend of their influence won't be measured until decades from now.
Why is Freud not on this list? His work is indispensable to more than a few thinkers on this list.
It would be nice to have a 19th century best of list. Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Marx...and then a 21st century list could be fun. Nancy, Zizek, Badiou, Sloterdijk, Stielger, Hamacher, Ronell, Butler, Delanda, Hardt, Ranciere, Cixious, Zupancic
The comment thread does explain it all. Moreover, I'm VP and have become Cardondale Chasmite. Moreover, I am unsure that Freud is a philosopher per se. Freud could be considered someone that is into mythmaking for human behavior. I'm unsure myself of his affects, and am content to have people like Kristeva representative of philosphical appropriations of him to the point they improve upon his misogyny.
The comment thread does explain it all. Moreover, I'm VP and have become Cardondale Chasmite. Moreover, I am unsure that Freud is a philosopher per se. Freud could be considered someone that is into mythmaking for human behavior. I'm unsure myself of his affects, and am content to have people like Kristeva representative of philosphical appropriations of him to the point they improve upon his misogyny.
14 comments:
Somebody voted Kristeva? Seriously? I mean, she's great and all, but if you consider factors like influence on others, staying power, etc, she's a bit of a blip...
I don't know. I would have gone with Butler in that department.
You need to update at the Ends of Thought!!
Just a thought: Badiou and Zizek are still writing and their influence won't be properly felt until the mid 21st Century. so I think both those thinkers are not in the 'Best Philosopher of the 20th' category..
Dear Anonymous,
I feel your concerns. However, there is significant work drawing from these people that merit, in my opinion, an estimation of their work. I think that Butler's influence is clearly felt for feminism in the tradition of cultural critique., and she is still living. Kristeva also comes to mind. Given that there are more philosophers than ever before in recorded history, we can have a better idea of living philosophers that have a current influence than in previous decades.
Best,
Ed
Cut the root and the whole tree dies, trim a branch and it will grow another--Using this simple criteria it would seem to me that, though there are other lineages represented (Bergson for example) Husserl is the main root of most of those on your list. That said i think a very strong argument could be made for someone missing from your list and often overlooked for his historical importance and far-reaching influence in not only philosophy but psychology, art and literature as well: Alexandre Kojève. His lectures were attended by Raymond Queneau, Georges Bataille, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, André Breton, Jacques Lacan and Raymond Aron. He also influenced Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida.
The problem with such a survey is the inevitable limitation of the website not allowing more than 30 entries, and the eclectic manner in which such a survey was constructed. There's also no Meinong, Natorp etc.
Since framing a poll around a forgone conclusion(Heidegger) maybe a more interesting question would have been: "Who is the most underrated" , "When will they shut up about...", or a "My guilty pleasure is..."
Perhaps, Anonymous....perhaps.
Husserl and Heidegger are my guilty pleasures alongside meta-ethics.
It´s pleasing to see how few votes Gadamer and Levinas get. There is hope for continental philosophy after all.
I think Levinas and Gadamer are interesting thinkers actually. I'm bewildered by Levinas' insistence that philosophy abandon ontology, especially ethics.
Deleuze is in second place, which I like. Again, Heidegger has had an immense influence on the 20th Century, and Deleuze is starting to rival it.
Of course I agree that both Badiou and Zizek are currently influencing thinking all over the world, but the full extend of their influence won't be measured until decades from now.
Why is Freud not on this list? His work is indispensable to more than a few thinkers on this list.
It would be nice to have a 19th century best of list.
Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Marx...and then a 21st century list could be fun. Nancy, Zizek, Badiou, Sloterdijk, Stielger, Hamacher, Ronell, Butler, Delanda, Hardt, Ranciere, Cixious, Zupancic
Dear most recent Anon,
The comment thread does explain it all. Moreover, I'm VP and have become Cardondale Chasmite. Moreover, I am unsure that Freud is a philosopher per se. Freud could be considered someone that is into mythmaking for human behavior. I'm unsure myself of his affects, and am content to have people like Kristeva representative of philosphical appropriations of him to the point they improve upon his misogyny.
Dear most recent Anon,
The comment thread does explain it all. Moreover, I'm VP and have become Cardondale Chasmite. Moreover, I am unsure that Freud is a philosopher per se. Freud could be considered someone that is into mythmaking for human behavior. I'm unsure myself of his affects, and am content to have people like Kristeva representative of philosphical appropriations of him to the point they improve upon his misogyny.
Post a Comment