One
central theme developed in pragmatism and nowhere else in philosophy is the power of an idea. For the pragmatist,
the conceptualization of the idea follows from their effectuating force in the
consequence of human action. Thus, a secondary – but no less influential idea –
follows from the rule of conceptualization. Ideas exert an influence in their
effectuating force on human experience. They are effectual, and this may be
referred back to what I meant by the power
of an idea, its effectuating force.
When we study an idea, we can trace its effectual
possibilities it possessed in the past and what such an idea may hold for us in
the future. However, as many have noted, pragmatism is extremely focused on the
possibilities of action to improve life. Therefore, pragmatism is often locked
temporally with its attention to the future. There is little, if any, attention
paid to the past. Yet, pragmatism’s insight into the effectual power of an idea
can be read backward through the hermeneutic threads that have persisted.
Through hermeneutics reflection, traces of ideas can conceived when we retell
the interpretation of their past. Gadamer strictly delimits that interpretation
is always enacted to understand the situated present.
I will suggest in this lecture both methods may be united
to address how various threads of power converge in the present. The power of
an interpretation arises when we first look to the possible conceptual linkages
of an idea maintained with other ideas or concepts. An interpretation
synthesizes various possible linkages between ideas and/or concepts; I call
these narrative threads. The past
concretizes in the interpretation of various narrative threads in the present
act of understanding, and a sense of
that idea’s danger, necessity, or emancipatory sense illuminates the
present-into-the-future. Then, we can evaluate the status of any given
narrative thread pragmatically. Let me give an example.
Narrative threads underlie the formation of any
discourse, and in fact, many discourses do not acknowledge the historical
senses implicit that inform these threads. Specific to our reflection, here,
the concretion of these discourses take for granted how they are constituted by
the reification of those that appropriate an idea to exert its power. My concern
is for threads of power. When the Affordable Care Act passed, the government
mandated that everyone purchase health insurance or face a penalty on their
taxes by January 2014. The conservative disagreement is about the mandate
itself. It forces people to purchase a service they do not want. If someone
cannot identify how their labor mixes with the gain of one’s own self-directed
purchasing, then Obama and the Democrats are transgressing the Lockean norm
about property to which we in the United States are so ensconced. There is an
implicit and formative sense of violating liberty here that can best be
understood as an idea deriving from Locke. Like it or not, ideas are
efficacious to the conceptual space in which these narrative threads are at
work at the intersubjective level. If the Affordable Care Act is to succeed,
then a cultural dialogue about Lockean status of property and liberty must be
addressed.
However
one understands these claims, these ideas are situated in a thread and the
concepts of that thread form a narrative in which the ideas work a certain way.
Synthesizing the temporal orientations and methods of pragmatism and hermeneutics
allows us to detect the movement of these effectual threads of power. We can
ask how exactly did the Lockean norm arise? Where did its philosophical
emanation exert its influence the most? Jefferson? Or did Jefferson’s words in
the Declaration of Independence implant
ideas of liberty and property in the public consciousness to the point that
these ideas have infected the political imaginary for several generations? One
can easily notice that wealthy Americans have a particular fondness for the
concept of the individual that Locke articulated in the 17th century
in what is now called “The Liberty Movement” and the rise of the populist
libertarian. In that fondness, the
fondness for individuality can be exposed in its shortcomings that arise when
we take into account exactly whom an individual can be. For when the 17th
century mind conceived of an individual’s liberty, women and other minorities
were not conceived in that narrative at all. Consequently, “all men were not
created equal” as we might say given that public consciousness now conceives
African-American men as men. In fact,
Locke wrote slavery into South Carolina’s constitution and Jefferson owned
slaves. The thread of power, here, may inherit these same difficulties of
patriarchy and exclusion. Mitt Romney’s 46% are not established
property-owners, but in the words of Ayn Rand “takers.”
These ideas (and many more) are linked to
us today. In fact, the pragmatic-hermeneutic stance is committed to the fact
that an idea may be at work in ways that we cannot imagine. The point of the
philosopher is to be sensitive to the historicity of ideas and how ideas
continue to exert their influence. So many threads of our ideologies and knowledge intertwine. Religion folds into politics. Politics folds into economics, and even religion folds into economics creating a culture saturated with how these threads tie together. Bound together, these threads create knotted narratives that often make little sense and threaten the ethical well-being of those people that unwittingly participate within these narratives. A significant effort of the philosopher is to untie these threads and distill their essence for others to see their harmful effects.
No comments:
Post a Comment